Fish, halibut, Atlantic and Pacific, cooked, dry heat vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, halibut, Atlantic and Pacific, cooked, dry heat
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, halibut, Atlantic and Pacific, cooked, dry heat | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 111 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 8% more |
| Protein | 22.54 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, halibut, Atlantic and Pacific, cooked, dry heat has 412% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.61 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 16% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 82 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, halibut, Atlantic and Pacific, cooked, dry heat has 1071% more |
| Calcium | 9 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 47% more |
| Iron | 0.2 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 87% more |
| Potassium | 528 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, halibut, Atlantic and Pacific, cooked, dry heat has 207% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.