Fish, halibut, Atlantic and Pacific, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, halibut, Atlantic and Pacific, raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, halibut, Atlantic and Pacific, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 91 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 24% more |
| Protein | 18.56 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, halibut, Atlantic and Pacific, raw has 322% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.33 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 31% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 68 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, halibut, Atlantic and Pacific, raw has 871% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 59% more |
| Iron | 0.16 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 89% more |
| Potassium | 435 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, halibut, Atlantic and Pacific, raw has 153% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.