Fish, halibut, Greenland, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, halibut, Greenland, raw
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, halibut, Greenland, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 186 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Fish, halibut, Greenland, raw has 55% more |
| Protein | 14.37 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, halibut, Greenland, raw has 227% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 13.84 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, halibut, Greenland, raw has 621% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 80 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, halibut, Greenland, raw has 1043% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 82% more |
| Iron | 0.66 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 56% more |
| Potassium | 268 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, halibut, Greenland, raw has 56% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.