Fish, pollock, Alaska, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, pollock, Alaska, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, pollock, Alaska, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 86.6164 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 4% more |
| Protein | 19.42 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fish, pollock, Alaska, cooked has 866% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 0.9946 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fish, pollock, Alaska, cooked has 563% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 166 mg | 36 mg ★ | Fish, pollock, Alaska, cooked has 361% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Iron | 0.29 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 364 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 23% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.