Fish, pollock, Alaska, raw (may contain additives to retain moisture) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, pollock, Alaska, raw (may contain additives to retain moisture)
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, pollock, Alaska, raw (may contain additives to retain moisture) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 56 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 53% more |
| Protein | 12.19 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, pollock, Alaska, raw (may contain additives to retain moisture) has 177% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 0.41 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 79% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 333 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, pollock, Alaska, raw (may contain additives to retain moisture) has 4657% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 12% more |
| Iron | 0.22 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 85% more |
| Potassium | 160 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 7% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.