Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) vs Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native)
4 wins
🏆
Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled
3 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 266 kcal | 246 kcal ★ | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 8% more |
| Protein | 30.7 g ★ | 24.04 g | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 28% more |
| Fat | 15.9 g ★ | 15.94 g | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 0% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 83 mg | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 100% more |
| Calcium | 38 mg ★ | 26 mg | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 46% more |
| Iron | 1.7 mg | 2.59 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 34% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 335 mg ★ | Beef, ground, 80% lean meat / 20% fat, patty, cooked, pan-broiled has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.