Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native)
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 266 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 74% more |
| Protein | 30.7 g ★ | 24.58 g | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 25% more |
| Fat | 15.9 g | 5.28 g ★ | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 201% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 100% more |
| Calcium | 38 mg ★ | 8 mg | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 375% more |
| Iron | 1.7 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 278% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.