Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native)
4 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
3 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 266 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 81% more |
| Protein | 30.7 g ★ | 30.13 g | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 2% more |
| Fat | 15.9 g | 2.08 g ★ | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 664% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 100% more |
| Calcium | 38 mg ★ | 9 mg | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 322% more |
| Iron | 1.7 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 139% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 249 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.