Fish, turbot, european, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, turbot, european, raw
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, turbot, european, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 95 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 21% more |
| Protein | 16.05 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, turbot, european, raw has 265% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.95 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, turbot, european, raw has 54% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 150 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, turbot, european, raw has 2043% more |
| Calcium | 18 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, turbot, european, raw has 6% more |
| Iron | 0.36 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 76% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.7 mg ★ | 0 mg | Fish, turbot, european, raw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 238 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, turbot, european, raw has 38% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.