Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
Nutrient Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 188 kcal 90 kcal Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 109% more
Protein 30.66 g 2.01 g Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 1425% more
Carbs 0 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Fat 6.32 g 0.15 g Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 4113% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 82 mg 36 mg Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 128% more
Calcium 24 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 37% more
Iron 3.05 mg 0.69 mg Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 342% more
Vitamin C 9 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 54% more
Potassium 459 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.