Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw vs Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw
5 wins
🏆
Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
5 wins
| Nutrient | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 kcal | 61 kcal ★ | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 134% more |
| Protein | 23.3 g ★ | 3.15 g | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 640% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 4.8 g ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 3.25 g ★ | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 48% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 5.05 g | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Sodium | 78 mg | 43 mg ★ | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 81% more |
| Calcium | 18 mg | 113 mg ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 84% more |
| Iron | 2.32 mg ★ | 0.03 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 7633% more |
| Vitamin C | 7 mg ★ | 0 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 436 mg ★ | 132 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 230% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.