Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 19% more |
| Protein | 23.3 g ★ | 4.4 g | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 430% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 1.92 g ★ | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 150% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 78 mg | 7 mg ★ | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 1014% more |
| Calcium | 18 mg ★ | 17 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 6% more |
| Iron | 2.32 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 56% more |
| Vitamin C | 7 mg ★ | 0 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 436 mg ★ | 172 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 153% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.