Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 59% more |
| Protein | 23.3 g ★ | 2.01 g | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 1059% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 0.15 g ★ | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 3100% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 78 mg | 36 mg ★ | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 117% more |
| Calcium | 18 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
| Iron | 2.32 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 236% more |
| Vitamin C | 7 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
| Potassium | 436 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 8% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.