Game meat, muskrat, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Game meat, muskrat, raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Game meat, muskrat, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 162 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Game meat, muskrat, raw has 35% more |
| Protein | 20.76 g ★ | 4.4 g | Game meat, muskrat, raw has 372% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 8.1 g | 1.92 g ★ | Game meat, muskrat, raw has 322% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 82 mg | 7 mg ★ | Game meat, muskrat, raw has 1071% more |
| Calcium | 25 mg ★ | 17 mg | Game meat, muskrat, raw has 47% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Vitamin C | 5 mg ★ | 0 mg | Game meat, muskrat, raw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 276 mg ★ | 172 mg | Game meat, muskrat, raw has 60% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.