Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 258 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 56% more |
| Protein | 25.55 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 18% more |
| Fat | 16.48 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 362% more |
| Sodium | 66 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 11% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 27% more |
| Iron | 1.98 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 90% more |
| Potassium | 313 mg ★ | 256 mg | Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 22% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.