Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 258 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 69% more |
| Protein | 25.55 g ★ | 24.58 g | Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 4% more |
| Fat | 16.48 g | 5.28 g ★ | Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 212% more |
| Sodium | 66 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 27% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg ★ | 8 mg | Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 38% more |
| Iron | 1.98 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 340% more |
| Potassium | 313 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 29% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.