Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, roasted vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, roasted
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, roasted | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 242 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 58% more |
| Protein | 26.2 g ★ | 24.58 g | Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 7% more |
| Fat | 14.42 g | 5.28 g ★ | Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 173% more |
| Sodium | 67 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 26% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg ★ | 8 mg | Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 25% more |
| Iron | 2.02 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 349% more |
| Potassium | 319 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 27% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.