Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, fast roasted vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, fast roasted
4 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
3 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, fast roasted | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 142 kcal ★ | 165 kcal | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 14% more |
| Protein | 23.69 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 24% more |
| Fat | 5.27 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, fast roasted has 48% more |
| Sodium | 61 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 18% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 73% more |
| Iron | 1.73 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, fast roasted has 66% more |
| Potassium | 339 mg ★ | 256 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, fast roasted has 32% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.