Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, raw
4 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
3 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 121 kcal ★ | 165 kcal | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 27% more |
| Protein | 21.68 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 30% more |
| Fat | 3.83 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, raw has 7% more |
| Sodium | 62 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 16% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 73% more |
| Iron | 1.52 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, raw has 46% more |
| Potassium | 346 mg ★ | 256 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, chump, boneless, separable lean only, raw has 35% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.