Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean and fat, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean and fat, raw
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean and fat, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 183 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean and fat, raw has 11% more |
| Protein | 20.09 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 35% more |
| Carbs | 0.09 g ★ | 0 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean and fat, raw has 0% more |
| Fat | 11.38 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean and fat, raw has 219% more |
| Sodium | 76 mg | 74 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean and fat, raw has 3% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 53% more |
| Iron | 1.28 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean and fat, raw has 23% more |
| Potassium | 286 mg ★ | 256 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean and fat, raw has 12% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.