Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean only, cooked, braised vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean only, cooked, braised
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean only, cooked, braised | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 209 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 27% more |
| Protein | 33.31 g ★ | 31.02 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 7% more |
| Fat | 8.4 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 135% more |
| Sodium | 77 mg | 74 mg ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 4% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 27% more |
| Iron | 2.24 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 115% more |
| Potassium | 258 mg ★ | 256 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, fore-shank, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 1% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.