Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 586 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 255% more |
| Protein | 9.72 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 69% more |
| Fat | 60.39 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 1592% more |
| Sodium | 35 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 53% more |
| Calcium | 27 mg ★ | 15 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 80% more |
| Iron | 1.39 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 34% more |
| Potassium | 87 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 66% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.