Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 586 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 283% more |
| Protein | 9.72 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 60% more |
| Fat | 60.39 g | 5.28 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 1044% more |
| Sodium | 35 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 61% more |
| Calcium | 27 mg ★ | 8 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 238% more |
| Iron | 1.39 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 209% more |
| Potassium | 87 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 80% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.