Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 640 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 288% more |
| Protein | 6.92 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 78% more |
| Fat | 67.63 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 1794% more |
| Sodium | 22 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 70% more |
| Calcium | 23 mg ★ | 15 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 53% more |
| Iron | 1.14 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 10% more |
| Potassium | 51 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 80% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.