Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 640 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 318% more |
| Protein | 6.92 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 72% more |
| Fat | 67.63 g | 5.28 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 1181% more |
| Sodium | 22 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 76% more |
| Calcium | 23 mg ★ | 8 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 188% more |
| Iron | 1.14 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 153% more |
| Potassium | 51 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 88% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.