Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 305 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 85% more |
| Protein | 24.42 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 21% more |
| Fat | 22.26 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 524% more |
| Sodium | 46 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 38% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg ★ | 15 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 13% more |
| Iron | 2.1 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 102% more |
| Potassium | 162 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 37% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.