Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 305 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 99% more |
| Protein | 24.42 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 1% more |
| Fat | 22.26 g | 5.28 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 322% more |
| Sodium | 46 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 49% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg ★ | 8 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 113% more |
| Iron | 2.1 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 367% more |
| Potassium | 162 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 63% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.