Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw
2 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 277 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 68% more |
| Protein | 16.74 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 46% more |
| Fat | 22.74 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 537% more |
| Sodium | 39 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 47% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 13% more |
| Iron | 1.49 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 43% more |
| Potassium | 136 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 47% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.