Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, cooked vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, cooked | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 206 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, cooked has 35% more |
| Protein | 29.59 g ★ | 24.58 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, cooked has 20% more |
| Fat | 8.86 g | 5.28 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, cooked has 68% more |
| Sodium | 50 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 44% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg ★ | 8 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, cooked has 63% more |
| Iron | 2.35 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, cooked has 422% more |
| Potassium | 188 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 57% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.