Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, raw
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 128 kcal ★ | 165 kcal | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 22% more |
| Protein | 20.75 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 33% more |
| Fat | 4.41 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, raw has 24% more |
| Sodium | 46 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 38% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 47% more |
| Iron | 1.64 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, raw has 58% more |
| Potassium | 171 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 33% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.