Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted
2 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 246 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted has 49% more |
| Protein | 24.81 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 20% more |
| Fat | 15.56 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted has 336% more |
| Sodium | 43 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 42% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 33% more |
| Iron | 2.1 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, cooked, roasted has 102% more |
| Potassium | 167 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 35% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.