Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, raw
2 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 201 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, raw has 31% more |
| Protein | 18.76 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 24% more |
| Fat | 13.37 g | 5.28 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, raw has 153% more |
| Sodium | 41 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 54% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 13% more |
| Iron | 1.6 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, raw has 256% more |
| Potassium | 160 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 64% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.