Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted
2 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 181 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 10% more |
| Protein | 27.68 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 11% more |
| Fat | 7.01 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 96% more |
| Sodium | 45 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 39% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 53% more |
| Iron | 2.24 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 115% more |
| Potassium | 183 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 29% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.