Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 181 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 18% more |
| Protein | 27.68 g ★ | 24.58 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 13% more |
| Fat | 7.01 g | 5.28 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 33% more |
| Sodium | 45 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 50% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 13% more |
| Iron | 2.24 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, frozen, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 398% more |
| Potassium | 183 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 58% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.