Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked
2 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 596 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 261% more |
| Protein | 8.53 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 73% more |
| Fat | 62.44 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 1649% more |
| Sodium | 52 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 30% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 60% more |
| Iron | 1.39 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, cooked has 34% more |
| Potassium | 198 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 23% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.