Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw
2 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
6 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 640 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw has 288% more |
| Protein | 4.63 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 85% more |
| Carbs | 1.26 g ★ | 0 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw has 0% more |
| Fat | 68.53 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, Intermuscular fat, raw has 1820% more |
| Sodium | 34 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 54% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 67% more |
| Iron | 0.72 mg | 1.04 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 31% more |
| Potassium | 119 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 54% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.