Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw
4 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 206 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 25% more |
| Protein | 18.64 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 40% more |
| Carbs | 0.13 g ★ | 0 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 0% more |
| Fat | 14.52 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 307% more |
| Sodium | 59 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 20% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 33% more |
| Iron | 1.49 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 43% more |
| Potassium | 315 mg ★ | 256 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 23% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.