Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 206 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 35% more |
| Protein | 18.64 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 24% more |
| Carbs | 0.13 g ★ | 0 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 0% more |
| Fat | 14.52 g | 5.28 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 175% more |
| Sodium | 59 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 34% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg ★ | 8 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 25% more |
| Iron | 1.49 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean and fat, raw has 231% more |
| Potassium | 315 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 28% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.