Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean only, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean only, raw
5 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
2 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean only, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 126 kcal ★ | 153 kcal | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 18% more |
| Protein | 21.1 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 14% more |
| Fat | 4.64 g ★ | 5.28 g | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 12% more |
| Sodium | 64 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 29% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg ★ | 8 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean only, raw has 38% more |
| Iron | 1.64 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, leg chop/steak, bone-in, separable lean only, raw has 264% more |
| Potassium | 350 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 20% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.