Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean and fat, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean and fat, raw
4 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean and fat, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 252 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean and fat, raw has 53% more |
| Protein | 16.9 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 46% more |
| Carbs | 0.2 g ★ | 0 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean and fat, raw has 0% more |
| Fat | 20.36 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean and fat, raw has 470% more |
| Sodium | 58 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 22% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 67% more |
| Iron | 1.05 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean and fat, raw has 1% more |
| Potassium | 280 mg ★ | 256 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean and fat, raw has 9% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.