Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 199 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 21% more |
| Protein | 25.14 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 19% more |
| Fat | 10.91 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 206% more |
| Sodium | 65 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 12% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 53% more |
| Iron | 1.38 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 33% more |
| Potassium | 337 mg ★ | 256 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, netted shoulder, rolled, boneless, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 32% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.