Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw
2 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
6 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 703 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 326% more |
| Protein | 3.87 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 88% more |
| Carbs | 0.55 g ★ | 0 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 0% more |
| Fat | 76.16 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 2033% more |
| Sodium | 28 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 62% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 80% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg | 1.04 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 55% more |
| Potassium | 93 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 64% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.