Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean and fat, cooked, slow roasted vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean and fat, cooked, slow roasted
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
5 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean and fat, cooked, slow roasted | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 208 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean and fat, cooked, slow roasted has 36% more |
| Protein | 23.41 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 5% more |
| Carbs | 0.03 g ★ | 0 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean and fat, cooked, slow roasted has 0% more |
| Fat | 12.68 g | 5.28 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean and fat, cooked, slow roasted has 140% more |
| Sodium | 61 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 32% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 50% more |
| Iron | 1.64 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean and fat, cooked, slow roasted has 264% more |
| Potassium | 349 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 21% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.