Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted
4 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
3 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 159 kcal ★ | 165 kcal | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 4% more |
| Protein | 25.29 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 18% more |
| Fat | 6.44 g | 3.57 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 80% more |
| Sodium | 62 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 16% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 73% more |
| Iron | 1.71 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 64% more |
| Potassium | 369 mg ★ | 256 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 44% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.