Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 159 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 4% more |
| Protein | 25.29 g ★ | 24.58 g | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 3% more |
| Fat | 6.44 g | 5.28 g ★ | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 22% more |
| Sodium | 62 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 31% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 50% more |
| Iron | 1.71 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Lamb, New Zealand, imported, tunnel-boned leg, chump off, shank off, separable lean only, cooked, slow roasted has 280% more |
| Potassium | 369 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 16% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.