Margarine, regular, 80% fat, composite, tub, with salt vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Margarine, regular, 80% fat, composite, tub, with salt
1 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
10 wins
| Nutrient | Margarine, regular, 80% fat, composite, tub, with salt | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 713 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Margarine, regular, 80% fat, composite, tub, with salt has 692% more |
| Protein | 0.22 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Carbs | 0.75 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more |
| Fat | 80.17 g | 0.15 g ★ | Margarine, regular, 80% fat, composite, tub, with salt has 53347% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 657 mg | 36 mg ★ | Margarine, regular, 80% fat, composite, tub, with salt has 1725% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Potassium | 17 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.