Margarine, regular, 80% fat, composite, tub, without salt vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Margarine, regular, 80% fat, composite, tub, without salt
2 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
9 wins
| Nutrient | Margarine, regular, 80% fat, composite, tub, without salt | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 713 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Margarine, regular, 80% fat, composite, tub, without salt has 494% more |
| Protein | 0.22 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 95% more |
| Carbs | 0.75 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 96% more |
| Fat | 80.17 g | 1.92 g ★ | Margarine, regular, 80% fat, composite, tub, without salt has 4076% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 28 mg | 7 mg ★ | Margarine, regular, 80% fat, composite, tub, without salt has 300% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 82% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.1 mg ★ | 0 mg | Margarine, regular, 80% fat, composite, tub, without salt has 0% more |
| Potassium | 17 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 90% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.