Margarine Spread, 40-49% fat, tub vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Margarine Spread, 40-49% fat, tub
1 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
9 wins
| Nutrient | Margarine Spread, 40-49% fat, tub | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 401 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Margarine Spread, 40-49% fat, tub has 234% more |
| Protein | 0.27 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 94% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 44.46 g | 1.92 g ★ | Margarine Spread, 40-49% fat, tub has 2216% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 716 mg | 7 mg ★ | Margarine Spread, 40-49% fat, tub has 10129% more |
| Calcium | 2 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 88% more |
| Iron | 0.06 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 96% more |
| Potassium | 17 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 90% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.