Margarine,spread, 35-39% fat, tub vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Margarine,spread, 35-39% fat, tub
1 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
9 wins
| Nutrient | Margarine,spread, 35-39% fat, tub | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 349 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Margarine,spread, 35-39% fat, tub has 191% more |
| Protein | 0.23 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 95% more |
| Carbs | 1.52 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 93% more |
| Fat | 37.98 g | 1.92 g ★ | Margarine,spread, 35-39% fat, tub has 1878% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 584 mg | 7 mg ★ | Margarine,spread, 35-39% fat, tub has 8243% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 65% more |
| Iron | 0.04 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 97% more |
| Potassium | 51 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 70% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.