Oscar Mayer, Ham (chopped with natural juice) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Oscar Mayer, Ham (chopped with natural juice)
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Oscar Mayer, Ham (chopped with natural juice) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 180 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Oscar Mayer, Ham (chopped with natural juice) has 100% more |
| Protein | 16.3 g ★ | 2.01 g | Oscar Mayer, Ham (chopped with natural juice) has 711% more |
| Carbs | 3.65 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Fat | 11.15 g | 0.15 g ★ | Oscar Mayer, Ham (chopped with natural juice) has 7333% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 2.2 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 66% more |
| Sodium | 1249 mg | 36 mg ★ | Oscar Mayer, Ham (chopped with natural juice) has 3369% more |
| Calcium | 9 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Iron | 1.3 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Oscar Mayer, Ham (chopped with natural juice) has 88% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 260 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.